How Many Countries Are There in the World?
February 15th, 2011 | Posted in Population Basics
by Carl Haub, senior demographer

Used under Creative Commons license from fdecomite.
Population and geography are forever intertwined. One question that pops up from time to time is the number of countries in the world. While not a question on everyone’s lips, it is certainly important when figuring out the population of the world! If one researched this quickly, it would be possible to come up with a variety of answers. Here are a few.
About.com Geography gives 195, but goes on to point out that there are “dozens” of territories or colonies (sic) that are not real “countries” in their reckoning such as Bermuda and Puerto Rico. Worldatlas.com gives a figure anywhere from 189 to 195. TV Chile’s Facebook page says 212. Many lists begin with the 192 United Nations members and may add a few such as Kosovo or Taiwan, not recognized by the UN. Another imaginative effort counted Internet domain names, such .de for Germany and came up with 243 and goes on to say that there’s no accepted number but between 193 and 250 is “rather certain!” When it comes to regions, infoplease.com gives 47 countries in Africa plus six islands off the coast for a presumed total of 53 but answerbag.com says 58, which is actually one more than PRB lists.
There is, of course, no single answer and much lies in one’s definition of a country. Loosely speaking, a country is an independent, sovereign state that has delegated none of it powers to another country. For its annual World Population Data Sheet, PRB does not use the term “country” but “geopolitical entity” — a neat way to avoid commitment! In the spreadsheet upon which the Data Sheet is based (which went from being handwritten on green accounting worksheets until the early 1980s to Lotus 1-2-3 and then on to Excel), there 240 countries and that number is about to rise.
Years ago, PRB based its list largely on the UN Demographic Yearbook, which is similar to the breakdown of countries and regions in the biennial world population projections of the UN Population Division. A country defined this way is actually to linked to whether or nor its population is shown separately. For example, the figures used for “France” in the Data Sheet and by the UN refer to métropolitaine France, which consists of the départements on the mainland plus Corsica. Guadeloupe, Guyana, Martinique, and Reunion are overseas departments and their populations are traditionally shown separately. Puerto Rico is similar in that it is a commonwealth with the United States and its population is individually listed, not lumped together with the United States. Its official name in Spanish translates as “Free Associated State,” which seems a bit stronger than commonwealth.
In 2010, there were 209 countries actually printed on the Data Sheet out of the 240 in the spreadsheet. There are currently two criteria for appearing on the print version: a population of 150,000 or more or UN membership, conditions set long ago. There are several major differences between PRB’s list and the UN’s. PRB does show both Kosovo and Taiwan as both are de facto self-governing entities, although not necessarily universally recognized.
More changes are coming for 2011. The southern part of Sudan recently voted for independence, which is proposed for July 2011. But a number of areas, Blue Nile and South Kurdufan state, along with the Abyei area must hold an election to decide if they wish to join the South and other areas are in dispute with neighboring countries. The country is also likely to select a new name. In the Caribbean, the Netherlands Antilles are no more, having dissolved in October 2010. So, Bonaire, Curacao, Saba, St. Eustatius, and St. Martin are now separate entities but won’t be printed on the Data Sheet since none have a population of 150,000 or more (although Curacao is getting close) and none have joined the UN. The 2011 World Population Data Sheet will then have 244 geopolitical entities totaling to world population – or 245.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
February 21st, 2011 at 2:53 pm
What a great topic! Your number is very close to the number of countries listed in the ISO 3166 country codes (currently 248).
March 17th, 2011 at 6:39 am
Dear Colleagues,
I trust you will agree with me when I report that human beings with feet of clay everywhere need to have the benefit of the best available science. Otherwise, humanity may venture perilously down the “primrose path” of unsustainable population increase that the self-proclaimed masters of the universe are adamantly advocating and relentlessly pursuing. Perhaps the most revealing “leading indicator” to watch, the one that is being ubiquitously ignored, is the rapid increase of absolute global human population numbers in our time.
We are routinely presented with plenty of factoids, figures and statistics as well as a misleading and tragically flawed Classical Demographic Transition Model. Where is the scientifically-driven evidence regarding population dynamics and unbridled, skyrocketing growth of the human species on Earth?
As humanity’s most luminous beacon of truth, science provides us with a last best hope for the survival of life as we know it on Earth. We must make certain that scientific evidence is never downplayed, distorted and denied by religious dogma, politics or ideological idiocy.
Let us not fail for another year to acknowledge extant research of human population dynamics. The willful refusal of many too many experts to assume their responsibilities to science and perform their duties to humanity could be one of the most colossal mistakes in human history. Such woefully inadequate behavior, as is evident in an incredible conspiracy of silence among experts, will soon enough be replaced with truthful expressions by those in possession of clear vision, adequate foresight, intellectual honesty and moral courage.
Hopefully leading thinkers and researchers will not continue suppressing scientific evidence of human population dynamics and instead heed the words of Nobel Laureate Sir John Sulston regarding the emerging and converging, human-driven global challenges that loom ominously before humankind in our time, “we’ve got to make sure that population is recognized…. as a multiplier of many others. We’ve got to make sure that population really does peak out when we hope it will.”
Sir John goes on, “what we want to do is to see the issue of population in the open, dispassionately discussed…. and then we’ll see where it goes.”
In what is admittedly a feeble effort to help John Sulston fulfill his charge to examine all available scientific evidence regarding human population dynamics, please give careful consideration to the following presentation and then take time to rigorously scrutinize the not yet overthrown science from Russell Hopfenberg and David Pimentel regarding human population dynamics and human overpopulation.
http://www.panearth.org/GPSO.htm
Please accept this invitation to discern the best available science of human population dynamics and human overpopulation; discover the facts; deliberate; draw logical conclusions; and disseminate the knowledge widely.
Thank you to all for considering this research. Comments from one and all are welcome.
Steven Earl Salmony
AWAREness Campaign on The Human Population, established 2001
Chapel Hill, NC
http://sustainabilityscience.org/content.html?contentid=1176
http://sustainabilitysoutheast.org/
June 23rd, 2011 at 9:06 pm
okaay, this was the most confusing thing i have ever read. It doesn’t actually say how many countries there are in the world. And that was my question so you failed. biu